Search for: "Jane Doe IP" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 5:47 pm
  What she does know is that AusKat James Ellsmore has prepared a report from the IP ventures panel at this year's AIPPI Congress where speakers examined the role and importance of IP as an intangible asset for raising capital and driving innovation. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has already received considerable attention for its approach to deterring so-called “copyright trolls”: plaintiffs with “improper motives” who file multitudes of infringement lawsuits to extort quick settlements. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
 The copyright owner files suit in district court against John/Jane Doe, and asks the Court for leave to serve early discovery, namely a subpoena to the ISP trying to determine the identity associated with the IP address on the day(s) of the purported infringement. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
  In court proceedings, the names John Doe or Jane Doe -- or John or Jane Roe --  are used as legal placeholders (scroll down) for various reasons. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
Read more about IP addresses at the Wikipedia IP address article. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Elements of Sunday Morning on September 4, 2016 (hosted by Jane Pauley) touched on patents, trademark, and copyright.As to patents/inventions, within a story on Jerry Lewis, there was discussion of how Lewis invented video assist.And in 1960, he made another, lesser-known contribution to filmmaking: Video assist, that is, instant video replay of a movie scene after a take. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:54 am by Ron Coleman
But his point hardly needs proving, does it? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:25 am
 Justin says that WHO does have a role and are a real player. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Intellectual Property – Interpreting the Scope of IP RightsModerator: Zahr Said, University of Washington School of Law Margaret-Jane Radin, The University of Michigan Law School: Patent scope. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Commonly this person is identified as `John Doe’ or `Jane Doe’.The District Court Judge began her opinion by explaining that Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs)   US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm by Kenan Farrell
Plaintiff Counsel:     Matthew Edward Dumas of Hostetter & O’Hara Defendant:     John Doe Cause:    Copyright Infringement, Civil Conspiracy, Contributory Infringement Court:    Southern District of Indiana Judge:     Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson Referred To: Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch Complaint: View this document on Scribd Exhibit A – IP Addresses of “Civil… [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:03 am by Kenan Farrell
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.213.184.255Cause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:33 pm
  As Jane explained, and which Leonore emphasized, the business must consider its IP strategy and how any IP can be used to achieve the business’ strategic objectives. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Abhik Majumdar
It is when fictitious names like John Doe or Jane Roe are used to mask the identity of parties who cannot be named for concerns of privacy or other legal factors: examples include victims of rape or other sexual offences, parties who are underage and so on. [read post]